By: Imtiaz Chowdhury, RMT

As a therapist, I’ve witnessed the transformative power of therapy in the healing process. The EASE framework, encompassing Engagement, Adaptability, Support, and Evaluation, provides a comprehensive structure for effective therapy. Each component harmonizes with various therapeutic modalities to foster growth, understanding, and lasting change. 

Engagement 

Engagement, the primary foundation of therapy, sets the tone for a harmonious therapeutic relationship. The client-therapist engagement in therapy is a crucial factor that significantly influences the overall therapy experience and outcomes. The therapeutic relationship, including the real relationship and the working alliance, plays a pivotal role in the success of therapy (Coco et al., 2011). It has been emphasized that therapist-client agreement on helpful aspects of therapy is associated with successful therapy outcomes (Chui et al., 2020). Furthermore, clients’ experiences in rehabilitation have shown that the relationship formed with their service providers is a critical determinant of the success or failure of therapy (Palmadottir, 2006). The importance of developing a strong therapy relationship has been highlighted, especially when working with specific client groups such as non-binary clients (Kelley, 2015).  

The type of activities and experiences within therapy also significantly impact the overall therapy experience. Clients have reported engaging in mutual collaboration with the therapist, feeling autonomous and openly introspective, and exploring significant relationships in a problem-oriented manner as helpful experiences in therapy (Heatherington et al., 2012). Additionally, the relationship between the client and therapist has been identified as central to the client’s experience of therapy, particularly in the context of occupational therapy and the use of a client-centered approach (Blank, 2004). Moreover, the agency of clients in therapy has been recognized as an important aspect of their experience, emphasizing the need for empowerment and client-centered care (Hoener et al., 2012).  

The client-therapist engagement in therapy, encompassing the therapeutic relationship, type of activities, and overall therapy experience, is a multifaceted and essential component of successful therapy outcomes. The findings from various studies underscore the significance of therapist-client agreement, the real relationship, and the working alliance in contributing to successful therapy outcomes. Additionally, the emphasis on client-centered care, mutual collaboration, and the agency of clients further highlights the importance of the client-therapist engagement in shaping the overall therapy experience. 

Adaptability 

The therapist’s adaptability in therapy is a critical factor that significantly influences the therapy process and outcomes. Therapist flexibility, particularly in accommodating the individual needs, goals, and preferences of clients, has been consistently associated with positive therapy outcomes across various contexts (Owen & Hilsenroth, 2014; Hudson et al., 2014). The flexibility therapists demonstrate in using techniques within a given treatment has been linked to better outcomes across their caseload, emphasizing the importance of adaptability at the individual client level (Owen & Hilsenroth, 2014). Furthermore, therapist flexibility has been found to be positively related to child involvement in cognitive-behavioral therapy for anxiety disorders in childhood, highlighting its significance in engaging clients, especially in the context of treating anxiety disorders in children (Hudson et al., 2014).  

Moreover, the physical settings in which therapy takes place also play a crucial role in the therapist’s adaptability. Therapists frequently described how they flexibly adapted and graded activities to enable the child to finish a task or achieve a goal, demonstrating the importance of adaptability in the physical therapy setting (D’Arrigo et al., 2020). Additionally, the adaptability of therapists in managing the process of assimilative integration has been emphasized, highlighting the importance of therapists’ relational flexibility in integrating different therapeutic approaches (Heer et al., 2022).  

The therapist’s adaptability is also crucial in the context of psychodynamic therapy, where therapists’ experiences of being constrained can affect their ability for ongoing moment-to-moment responsiveness in their communication with patients, underscoring the need for flexibility in therapeutic approaches (Jones et al., 2020). Furthermore, the adaptability of therapists in different health care settings has been shown to significantly impact the type and utilization of physical rehabilitation administered to patients, emphasizing the importance of adaptability in delivering effective therapy across diverse practice settings (Beattie et al., 2013).  

The therapist’s adaptability in therapy, encompassing flexibility in accommodating individual client needs, goals, and preferences, as well as adapting to diverse physical settings, is a fundamental aspect of successful therapy outcomes. The findings from various studies underscore the significance of therapist flexibility in engaging clients, integrating different therapeutic approaches, and delivering effective therapy across diverse practice settings.  

Support 

The support of the therapist to the client in therapy significantly influences the therapeutic process and outcomes. Research consistently highlights the significance of therapist support and validation in forming a strong therapeutic alliance and contributing to positive therapy outcomes (Chui et al., 2020). The need for therapist support and validation has been identified as a crucial aspect of client experiences in psychotherapy, forming a significant cluster of client experiences (Chui et al., 2020). Furthermore, the development of a strong therapy relationship, particularly when working with specific client groups such as lesbian and gay clients, has been associated with the importance of therapist support (Kelley, 2015).  

Moreover, the therapist’s support plays a crucial role in engaging clients and promoting adherence to therapy. Clients receiving extra support from therapists have reported that it helped them to continue treatment by strongly adhering to the therapy modules, emphasizing the impact of therapist support on client engagement (Faisal & Masood, 2022). Additionally, the use of supportive counseling skills such as empathy and active listening has been recognized as critical ingredients of all psychotherapies, highlighting the importance of therapist support in facilitating effective therapeutic interactions (Zhang et al., 2023).  

The therapist’s support is also essential in the context of multicultural competencies, where therapists need to attend to cultural factors in ways that are uniquely tailored to the client, emphasizing the importance of culturally sensitive support from therapists (Owen et al., 2011). Furthermore, the therapist’s support in creating support documents/manuals and record-keeping has been identified as a crucial aspect of therapist-supported online interventions for children and young people, highlighting the multifaceted nature of therapist support in diverse therapeutic contexts (Chamberlain et al., 2020).  

In conclusion, the therapist’s support to the client in therapy, encompassing validation, empathy, and culturally sensitive support, are fundamental aspects of successful therapy outcomes. The findings from various studies underscore the significance of therapist support in forming a strong therapeutic alliance, promoting client engagement, and facilitating effective therapeutic interactions.  

Evaluation 

Evaluation, the final reflection of therapy, assesses progress and informs treatment plans. The ongoing evaluation in therapy is a critical aspect that significantly influences the therapeutic process and outcomes. Research has consistently highlighted the importance of ongoing evaluation in therapy across various contexts. For instance, studies have evaluated the effects of supplying therapists with feedback about client improvement through the use of progress graphs, as well as with warnings for clients who were failing to make the expected degree of progress Lambert et al. (2002). This emphasizes the significance of ongoing evaluation in providing therapists with valuable feedback to enhance psychotherapy outcomes.  

Furthermore, ongoing clinical trials have been crucial in elucidating the role of different therapies and determining optimal interventions for specific populations (Clement & Sweeney, 2017). Ongoing clinical trials are evaluating combination therapy to help elucidate the role of each therapy separately and together to determine optimal interventions for this population.  

In addition, the ability of therapists to detect client deterioration through the review of therapy progress notes has been examined, highlighting the importance of ongoing evaluation in monitoring client progress and well-being (Hatfield et al., 2009). Moreover, the pathologic assessment of therapeutic response and evaluation of residual disease is important because the histologic response to therapy or tumor response grade (TRG) has been shown to correlate with survival (O’Neil & Damjanov, 2009).  

The ongoing evaluation of therapy progress and client-reported outcomes in naturalistic settings has been recognized as valuable guidance for the assessment, treatment, and monitoring of clients, emphasizing the importance of ongoing evaluation in shaping therapeutic practices (Wu et al., 2022). Additionally, using pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling and simulation to evaluate the importance of schedule in therapy could lead to improved tumor response with minimized toxicities (Panetta et al., 2008).  

In conclusion, ongoing evaluation in therapy, encompassing feedback mechanisms, clinical trial assessments, monitoring client progress, and determining therapeutic responses, is a fundamental aspect of successful therapy outcomes. The findings from various studies underscore the significance of ongoing evaluation in providing therapists with valuable feedback, shaping therapeutic approaches, and monitoring client progress and well-being.  

References: 

Beattie, P., Nelson, R., & Basile, K. (2013). Differences among health care settings in utilization and type of physical rehabilitation administered to patients receiving workers’ compensation for musculoskeletal disorders. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 23(3), 347–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-012-9412-y   

Blank, A. (2004). Clients’ experience of partnership with occupational therapists in community mental health. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67(3), 118–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/030802260406700304 

Chamberlain, L., Hall, C., Andrén, P., Davies, E., Kilgariff, J., Kouzoupi, N., Rothwell, K., Stein, J., & Hollis, C. (2020). Therapist-supported online interventions for children and young people with tic disorders: Lessons learned from a randomized controlled trial and considerations for future practice. JMIR Mental Health, 7(10), e19600. https://doi.org/10.2196/19600 

Chui, H., Palma, B., Jackson, J., & Hill, C. E. (2020). Therapist–client agreement on helpful and wished‐for experiences in psychotherapy: Associations with outcome. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 67(3), 349–360. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000393 

Clement, J., & Sweeney, C. (2017). Evolving treatment of oligometastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Journal of Oncology Practice, 13(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1200/jop.2016.018523 

Coco, G. L., Gullo, S., Prestano, C., & Gelso, C. J. (2011). Relation of the real relationship and the working alliance to the outcome of brief psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 48(4), 359–367. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022426 

D’Arrigo, R., Copley, J., Poulsen, A. A., & Ziviani, J. (2020). The engaged child in occupational therapy. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 87(2), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008417420905708 

Faisal, K., & Masood, A. (2022). Efficacy of therapist guided internet based cognitive behavioural therapy for depression: A qualitative exploration of therapists and clients experiences. Journal of Professional & Applied Psychology, 3(4), 453–468. https://doi.org/10.52053/jpap.v3i4.130 

Hatfield, D., McCullough, L., Frantz, S., & Krieger, K. (2009). Do we know when our clients get worse? An investigation of therapists’ ability to detect negative client change. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 17(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.656 

Heer, S., Stähli, A., Edöcs, J., Suppiger, E., Holtforth, M. G., Babl, A., Berger, T., & Caspar, F. (2022). How do novice therapists manage the process of assimilative integration? A qualitative interview study about the application of implicit heuristics. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 32(2), 225–241. https://doi.org/10.1037/int0000268 

Heatherington, L., Constantino, M. J., Friedlander, M. L., Angus, L. E., & Messer, S. B. (2012). Clients’ perspectives on corrective experiences in psychotherapy. In L. G. Castonguay & C. E. Hill (Eds.), Transformation in psychotherapy: Corrective experiences across cognitive behavioral, humanistic, and psychoanalytic traditions (pp. 161–190). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13747-010 

Hoener, C., Stiles, W. B., Luka, B. J., & Gordon, R. A. (2012). Client experiences of agency in therapy. Person-Centered & Experiential Psychotherapies, 11(1), 64–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/14779757.2011.639460 

Hudson, J., Kendall, P., Chu, B., Gosch, E., Martin, E., Taylor, A., & Knight, A. (2014). Child involvement, alliance, and therapist flexibility: Process variables in cognitive-behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in childhood. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 52, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2013.09.011 

Jones, M., Råbu, M., Røssberg, J. I., & Ulberg, R. (2020). Therapists’ experiences of psychodynamic therapy with and without transference interventions for adolescents with depression. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(13), 4628. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17134628 

Kelley, F. A. (2015). The therapy relationship with lesbian and gay clients. Psychotherapy, 52(1), 113–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037958 

Lambert, M. J., Whipple, J. L., Vermeersch, D. A., Smart, D. W., Hawkins, E. J., Nielsen, S. L., & Goates, M. (2002). Enhancing psychotherapy outcomes via providing feedback on client progress: A replication. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 9(2), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.324 

O’Neil, M., & Damjanov, I. (2009). Histopathology of colorectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy. The Open Pathology Journal, 3(2), 91–98. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874375700903020091 

Owen, J. J., & Hilsenroth, M. J. (2014). Treatment adherence: The importance of therapist flexibility in relation to therapy outcomes. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 61(2), 280–288. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035753 

Owen, J., Leach, M. M., Wampold, B., & Rodolfa, E. (2011). Client and therapist variability in clients’ perceptions of their therapists’ multicultural competencies. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 58(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021496 

Palmadottir, G. (2006). Client-therapist relationships: Experiences of occupational therapy clients in rehabilitation. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 69(9), 394–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/030802260606900902   

Panetta, J. C., Schaiquevich, P., Santana, V. M., & Stewart, C. F. (2008). Using pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling and simulation to evaluate importance of schedule in topotecan therapy for pediatric neuroblastoma. Clinical Cancer Research, 14(1), 318–325. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-07-1243 

Wu, Q., McWey, L. M., & Ledermann, T. (2022). Which therapist perceptions best predict client outcomes? A naturalistic examination. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 49(1), 151–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12611 

Zhang, X., Tanana, M., Weitzman, L., Narayanan, S., Atkins, D. C., & Imel, Z. E. (2023). You never know what you are going to get: Large-scale assessment of therapists’ supportive counseling skill use. Psychotherapy, 60(2), 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000460